Discussion:
Most irrational speculations of physics
(too old to reply)
Serg io
2017-07-22 13:41:36 UTC
Permalink
x(t) indicates x() is a function of t, under certain conditions. (it may
not be a function)
No shit. Try to convince me it is not.
so you admit that everything I stated is true.

and realize you are only discussing nomenclature use.
Serg io
2017-07-22 18:17:51 UTC
Permalink
We are discussing if the expression " x(t) = t^2 " is an *equation*
or not.
no, it's a function, as described by the Scientific Method.
x is a function of t.
So what! We are not discussing if its a function; we are discussing
the
Amazing how all these half-engineers are failing seeing that function
immediately. Functions characterize by a direction
INPUT(..) -> FUNCTION BLOCK -> OUTPUT(s)
That equal sign is not very clever. Read it OUT LOUD, in words,
Stephane. You are not that stupid you appear. How about this one,
x(t,s)=t^s. These half-engineers are crazy.
I see you do not know math very well.
*your definition* of function is incomplete, not precise, and wrong. you
use undefined symbols.
Another cretinism spewed out. That's the whole idea in having symbols, no
need to define them yet. In math one may primarily work in symbols or
numerical, something even imbeciles should know. Talk to somebody else.
I see you have a new name, dweebie.

So far you get an F, for FAIL.
you fail to get anything right.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...