Discussion:
FTL is a fact, relativity is dead.
(too old to reply)
Vilas Tamhane
2012-07-30 16:14:59 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
Yes, I am a perfectionist, in my videos and my theories :-)
Uwe Hayek.
 http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NeverHeard.html
=====================================
I know what a magnetic field is from experience, and I know what
an electric field is too, but an electromagnetic field? Is that some kind
of faggot, like you?
Add me to your fumbles, Dork, I've never heard of an electromagnetic
field either, ya fucking moron.
-- Androcles
If you see a naked woman from the front side, it is an electric field.
When you look at her from the back, it is magnetic field.
If you run along with the woman, you don’t see any field. If you run
faster you will see electric field. If you run slower you will see
magnetic field. Thus relative motion decides nature of the filed.
Wasn’t Einstein correct?
Vilas Tamhane
2012-07-31 03:29:15 UTC
Permalink
[snip]
Yes, I am a perfectionist, in my videos and my theories :-)
Uwe Hayek.
 http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NeverHeard.html
=====================================
I know what a magnetic field is from experience, and I know what
an electric field is too, but an electromagnetic field? Is that some kind
of faggot, like you?
Add me to your fumbles, Dork, I've never heard of an electromagnetic
field either, ya fucking moron.
-- Androcles
If you see a naked woman from the front side, it is an electric field.
When you look at her from the back, it is a magnetic field.
If you run along with the woman, you don’t see any field. If you run
faster you will see electric field. If you run slower you will see
magnetic field. Thus relative motion decides nature of the filed.
So electromagnetic field is one and the same object. It all depends on
how you view it.
Wasn’t Einstein correct?

Loading...